'Welcome judgment, request PM Modi to restore statehood in J&K soon': Karan Singh on SC's Article 370 verdict

Minutes after the Supreme Court upheld the government’s decision to abrogate Article 370, Senior Congress leader Karan Singh on Monday welcomed the judgment and requested Prime Minister Narendra Modi to restore statehood to the union territory of Jammu and Kashmir soon.

#WATCH | On Supreme Court constitutionally validating the removal of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir, senior Congress leader and Maharaja Hari Singh's son Karan Singh says, "I welcome it. Now it has become clear that whatever happened is constitutionally valid...I request PM… pic.twitter.com/R9GoiMrGe1

— ANI (@ANI) December 11, 2023

Speaking to ANI news agency, Singh said, “I welcome it (judgment). Now it has become clear that whatever happened is constitutionally valid…I request PM Modi to restore statehood soon….’’ Earlier in the day, the top court upheld the government’s decision to abrogate Article 370, which bestowed special status on the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir, and said steps should be taken to conduct elections in the Assembly by 30 September next year. The apex court also directed that statehood to the union territory of Jammu and Kashmir be restored at the earliest. Writing the judgement for himself and Justices Gavai and Surya Kant, Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud said Article 370 of the Constitution was a temporary provision and the president has the power to revoke it. The apex court also upheld the validity of the decision to carve out the union territory of Ladakh from Jammu and Kashmir on August 5, 2019. On that day, the government abrogated Article 370 and bifurcated the state into two union territories - Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh. The erstwhile state does not have internal sovereignty different from other states of the country, the CJI said. “… all provisions of the Indian Constitution can be applied to J-K,” the CJI said. “We hold the exercise of presidential power to issue constitutional order abrogating Article 370 of Constitution as valid,” the CJI said. Jammu and Kashmir became an integral part of India and this is evident from Articles 1 and 370, he said while pronouncing the judgment. The Constituent Assembly of J&K was never intended to be permanent body, the CJI stated. Article 370, Justice Chandrachud said, was an interim arrangement due to war conditions in the erstwhile state. The princely state had become an integral part of India and this is evident from Articles 1 and 370, the CJI said. The bench comprising CJI D Y Chandrachud and Justices Gavai, Surya Kant, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, assembled at 10.56 am to pronounce the three separate and concurring judgements Justices Kaul and Khanna wrote their judgments separately. In his concurring judgment, Justice Khanna said the purpose of Article 370 was to slowly bring Jammu and Kashmir at par with other Indian states. He directed the setting up of a truth-and-reconciliation commission to probe human rights violations both by the state and non-state actors. The apex court reserved its verdict in the matter on 5 September after a 16-day hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the abrogation of the provisions of Article 370. With inputs from agencies