'Have a crush on you'... What Epstein files reveal about Bill Clinton

The names of former United States President Bill Clinton and former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are back in the spotlight.

The US Justice Department has freshly released millions of internal documents related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, shedding light on his connections with powerful figures which also includes the Clintons.

This has resulted in the a Republican-led House investigation to push the Clintons toward agreeing to testify under oath.

While none of the released material accuses either Clinton of criminal conduct, the stakes remain high.

What Epstein Files reveal about the Clintons so far

Bill Clinton travelled on Epstein’s private jets at least 16 times

The cache of files revealed that the former US president socialised with Epstein and travelled on his private aircraft multiple times after leaving office.

Flight records show Clinton flew at least 16 times on Epstein’s jet in the early 2000s, including both domestic and international trips.

More from Explainers

'Epstein Files' comes to Bollywood: Kangana Ranaut disturbed as actress says 'Crimes happen everywhere but...' Watch: Epstein survivors demand release of withheld files in Super Bowl ad

The destinations listed in flight logs include Norway, Russia, Hong Kong, and China. The records do not show Clinton travelling to Epstein’s private island. The trips often included multiple stops and were sometimes part of extended international itineraries.

On several occasions, Clinton was accompanied by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The logs form part of a broader body of evidence introduced during Maxwell’s 2021 sex-trafficking trial, which focused on her role in recruiting and abusing girls alongside Epstein.

Bill Clinton in a swimming pool

Photographs released by the Justice Department depict Clinton in various social settings linked to Epstein. In one image, Clinton is seen swimming alongside Ghislaine Maxwell.

In another, he appears in a hot tub with an unidentified woman. The faces of women in several images have been redacted.

A new photograph showing Clinton cutting a slice of cake for a woman aboard what appears to be a private jet, has also surfaced.

Editor’s Picks

1

America matters, but it’s not indispensable for the world 2

Elite decadence documented in Epstein files marks the final stages of the decline of American empire

Two men are visible standing nearby, while the faces of two women in the image have been obscured. The US Justice Department said it does not know where or when the photograph was taken, nor who captured it.

Clinton has consistently denied any misconduct related to Epstein and has said he regrets their association.

In his 2024 memoir Citizen: My Life After the White House, he addressed the issue directly, “The bottom line is, even though it allowed me to visit the work of my foundation, travelling on Epstein’s plane was not worth the years of questioning afterward. I wish I had never met him.”

Emails between Maxwell and Clinton’s staff

The latest document releases also include email exchanges between Maxwell and individuals associated with Clinton’s post-presidential office between 2001 and 2004. Many of the names and addresses in these communications are redacted, often appearing only as “WJC,” a reference to William J Clinton’s office.

According to Clinton spokesperson Angel Ureña, Bill Clinton did not personally send any of the emails contained in the files.

The communications largely concern logistical matters, including travel arrangements, dining plans, and social invitations. In some cases, Maxwell relayed last-minute messages regarding Clinton’s potential attendance at events.

In an April 2003 email sent to a redacted Clinton office address, Maxwell wrote, “Glad you are coming to the dinner - JE says do you think CLinton would like to come - let me know.”

Another exchange from December 2001 involved coordination around a golf outing during a trip to Scotland. A Clinton staffer asked Maxwell for Prince Andrew’s phone number.

Maxwell responded, “Just spoke to Andrew. He is not currently in Scotland but is going to m. He says if I give him a no. he will ring Clinton. Doug, do you want him to call you ?”

The identity of “Doug” is unclear, though a senior adviser to Clinton at the time was Doug Band.

Some emails show Maxwell adopting a flirtatious tone toward redacted Clinton office recipients.

In one exchange, she wrote that she had told a tabloid what “supper stud you are and how I have a crush on you and how you are hung like a horse and- well you get the picture. Hope you don’t mind!”

In another message from 2002, sent from a Clinton-associated email address, an unidentified individual wrote to Maxwell: “Went home with someone I have before, a 40 year old blonde big boobby widow if you can believe that. I really need to stop drinking.”

There is no evidence in the files that Maxwell directly corresponded with Bill Clinton himself. In one email where the sender’s name is not redacted, Doug Band stated that he and Clinton shared a Blackberry account.

Maxwell’s continued presence in Clinton circles

The files also illustrate that Maxwell remained connected to Clinton-linked events even after public allegations against her surfaced. In 2009, Maxwell was accused of recruiting and sexually abusing girls alongside Epstein.

Despite those accusations, she attended the Clinton Global Initiative conference in September 2013. At the event, Maxwell was recognised for her TerraMar Project, an ocean conservation non-profit she founded in 2012.

The organisation, which has since ceased operations, played a role in restoring Maxwell’s public image for a period, according to reporting based on the released documents.

What next for the Clintons

House Oversight Committee presses ahead with subpoenas

Late on Monday, attorneys representing Bill and Hillary Clinton informed staff of the House Oversight Committee that both would comply with subpoenas and appear for sworn depositions.

The communication stated that the Clintons “will appear for depositions on mutually agreeable dates,” marking a significant shift after months of resistance to the committee’s demands.

The agreement, however, remained incomplete. US Representative James Comer, the Kentucky Republican who chairs the Oversight Committee, said the terms had not yet been finalised and stressed that no formal documentation had been signed.

“We don’t have anything in writing,” Comer told reporters, adding that while he was open to accepting the offer, “it depends on what they say.”

The negotiations came at a critical moment, as Republican leadership was moving criminal contempt of Congress resolutions through the House Rules Committee.

The resolutions represented the final procedural step before a full House vote and carried serious consequences. If adopted and successfully prosecuted by the Department of Justice, contempt charges could result in substantial fines or incarceration.

As talks between Comer and the Clintons’ legal team continued, the House Rules Committee postponed advancing the contempt resolutions. The delay temporarily halted what could have been a historic escalation of congressional authority.

Congress has rarely invoked criminal contempt, and never before against a former president. Historically, lawmakers have shown restraint toward former occupants of the Oval Office, even during contentious investigations.

Earlier on February 2, Comer rejected a proposal from Clinton attorneys that would have allowed Bill Clinton to participate in a four-hour transcribed interview while Hillary Clinton submitted a sworn written declaration.

🚨 After defying lawful subpoenas, Bill and Hillary Clinton are trying to dodge contempt by requesting special treatment.

The Clintons are not above the law.

Our response to the Clintons' latest demands 👇🏻 pic.twitter.com/C5NI1c3ysg

— Oversight Committee (@GOPoversight) February 2, 2026

The subpoenas were first issued in August, when the Oversight Committee formally launched its investigation into Epstein’s network. For months, the Clintons’ legal team challenged the validity of the subpoenas, resisting compliance.

Last month, the Republican-controlled committee advanced criminal contempt charges. Notably, the vote revealed fractures within the Democratic caucus.

Nine of the committee’s 21 Democrats joined Republicans in supporting contempt charges against Bill Clinton, arguing that transparency in the Epstein investigation required full cooperation.

Three Democrats also voted in favour of advancing charges against Hillary Clinton.

Political divisions sharpen over Epstein investigation

Epstein, a financier with extensive connections to elite circles, died by suicide in a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges involving minors.

Clinton’s past association with Epstein has resurfaced as a focal point of Republican criticism.

Democrats, by contrast, have accused Comer of politicising the investigation and selectively targeting the Clintons while overlooking other issues.

House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries said said his caucus would discuss the contempt resolutions internally, Jeffries made clear that he opposed them. He described his position as a “hard no” and accused Comer of prioritising political retribution over substantive oversight.

Jeffries also argued that Republicans had failed to hold the Trump administration accountable for delays in producing Justice Department case files related to Epstein.

Democrats have said the department has not yet released all material in its possession concerning the late financier. “They don’t want a serious interview, they want a charade,” Jeffries said.

If Bill Clinton ultimately appears before the committee, it would mark the first time a former president testifies before Congress since Gerald Ford did so in 1983, setting aside decades of precedent.

Todd Blanche, the Justice Department’s second-highest-ranking official, said the contents of the Epstein files “did not amount to evidence of criminal sexual activity by those named in the files.”

With inputs from agencies